Articles about the dangers of internet dating margin of error in radiocarbon dating
They think that farming the seas or developing new strains of wheat will solve the problem--technologically.
I try to show here that the solution they seek cannot be found.
The second reason springs directly from biological facts.
To live, any organism must have a source of energy (for example, food).
Wiesner and York exhibited this courage; publishing in a science journal, they insisted that the solution to the problem was not to be found in the natural sciences. ." Whether they were right or not is not the concern of the present article.
They cautiously qualified their statement with the phrase, "It is our considered professional judgment. Rather, the concern here is with the important concept of a class of human problems which can be called "no technical solution problems," and, more specifically, with the identification and discussion of one of these.
Put another way, there is no "technical solution" to the problem.
I can win only by giving a radical meaning to the word "win." I can hit my opponent over the head; or I can drug him; or I can falsify the records.
It is fair to say that most people who anguish over the population problem are trying to find a way to avoid the evils of overpopulation without relinquishing any of the privileges they now enjoy.
In our day (though not in earlier times) technical solutions are always welcome.
Because of previous failures in prophecy, it takes courage to assert that a desired technical solution is not possible.
This energy is utilized for two purposes: mere maintenance and work.
For man, maintenance of life requires about 1600 kilocalories a day ("maintenance calories").
In a finite world this means that the per capita share of the world's goods must steadily decrease. A fair defense can be put forward for the view that the world is infinite; or that we do not know that it is not.